J&K High Court Delivers Landmark Judgment: Orders Registration of Sale Deed on Banjar Qadeem Arak Land Falling in Jammu Master Plan Area

J&K High Court Delivers Landmark Judgment: Orders Registration of Sale Deed on Banjar Qadeem Arak Land Falling in Jammu Master Plan Area

Verdict paves the way for registration of urban land previously barred under outdated revenue classifications; raises questions over treatment of other lands like ‘Gair Mumkin Khad’

||Black and White Digital News ||
||Parvinder Singh April 11,2025 ||

Jammu: In a landmark judgment that may have far-reaching consequences for urban land rights in Jammu and Kashmir, the High Court of J&K has directed the registration of a sale deed involving land classified as Banjar Qadeem Arak, situated in Paloura, Jammu, on the grounds that the land lies within the Jammu Municipal Corporation limits and is part of the notified Master Plan area.

The ruling came in WP(C) No. 346/2023 filed by Mohan Lal, challenging the refusal by the Sub-Registrar Jammu North to register a sale deed dated 09.02.2022 for land measuring 7 marlas in Survey No. 1142 min, Khata No. 718 min, Khewat No. 64 in Village Paloura.

The Legal Dispute: From Registered Deeds to Official Stonewalling

The petitioner had earlier purchased the said land through two validly registered sale deeds from one Raghubir Singh, who himself had acquired it through a sale deed executed in 1982. Notably, the petitioner had secured mutation entries in revenue records and even obtained building permission from the Jammu Municipal Corporation (JMC) on 14.11.2022.

However, when the petitioner attempted to resell the plot to one Rakesh Gupta and submitted the sale deed for registration on 10.02.2022—after duly paying stamp duty of Rs. 1.48 lakh and registration fee of Rs. 25,390—the Sub-Registrar withheld the sale deed, citing that the land was classified as Banjar Qadeem Arak, which is barred from sale under Section 133-BB of the J&K Land Revenue Act.

The Court’s Findings: Urban Land Not Bound by Rural Revenue Restrictions

Delivering a well-reasoned judgment, Justice Rajnesh Oswal ruled that the action of the Sub-Registrar was illegal and lacked legal backing, as Section 133-BB is not applicable to lands that fall within municipal limits and are not assessed for land revenue.

The court noted:

“The entry of ‘Banjar Qadeem Arak’ was made in the revenue record in 1959-60. Since then, Jammu has undergone vast urbanization. The land in question falls in Ward No. 38 of the JMC. There is clear endorsement on the Fard Intekhab to this effect and the area is surrounded by houses and shops.”

The Court cited Section 4 of the J&K Land Revenue Act, which clearly excludes urban areas not assessed to land revenue from the purview of the Act, except for administrative record-keeping and cess collection.

Critical Flaw: Absence of Board of Revenue Makes Section 133-BB Inapplicable

The Revenue Department argued that Section 133-BB bars the registration and transfer of arak (grazing) land. However, the Court pointed out that this section requires regulatory permission by a Board of Revenue, which has not been constituted yet, rendering the provision toothless in practical terms.

Further, the Court emphasized that the land classification system is outdated, and administrative reluctance to revise land records has created widespread legal limbo for urban residents, even where land use has been clearly changed by planning authorities like JDA and Municipal Corporations.

Verdict Highlights:

• The Sub-Registrar’s report dated 06.02.2023 was quashed.

• The sale deed must be registered without delay.

• No additional stamp duty or registration fee can be demanded as the petitioner has already paid in full.

• The government was criticized for not updating land records or aligning them with Master Plans.

• The Court urged a shift in soil classification policy toward just “agriculture” and “non-agriculture” categories.

Policy and Administrative Implications:

This verdict may force the J&K administration to take a fresh look at several unresolved issues:

1. Applicability to Gair Mumkin Khad Lands:
With thousands of residents facing rejection of sale deeds and building permissions due to Gair Mumkin Khad classification—often within Master Plan zones—this verdict could set the stage for further legal challenges and potential policy reforms.

2. Need for Unified Land Records:

The judgment lays bare the disconnect between Revenue Department records and Town Planning/Urban Development authorities, with citizens bearing the brunt of this bureaucratic gap.

3. Formation of the Board of Revenue:

Without a functioning Board, critical laws like Section 133-BB become unimplementable, leading to arbitrary enforcement.

4. Boost for Urban Development:

Legal clarity will likely restore investor confidence in urban property markets and reduce harassment by officials who routinely cite legacy classifications to deny transactions.

Legal Experts React:

Senior advocates and legal analysts hailed the verdict as a progressive and rational interpretation of law suited to current urban realities.

“The Court has drawn a clear line between rural revenue norms and urban property rights. This ruling could open the floodgates for thousands of pending registrations in JDA and JMC areas,” said a senior lawyer.

Next Steps: Will the Government Act or Appeal?

While the judgment is binding for the case at hand, it also creates pressure on the J&K administration to either:

• Accept the ruling and issue policy clarifications for similar lands across UT,
• Or appeal the decision, which could further delay clarity on the matter.

In an affidavit, even the Revenue Department acknowledged the need to revisit the soil classification system and adapt it to the present needs of urban planning and development.

The High Court’s judgment is not merely a verdict—it is a statement against systemic inertia, urging the administration to modernize land governance in J&K. With urbanization on the rise and public frustration over opaque land laws mounting, the judgment offers hope—and a legal precedent—for a more transparent, updated, and citizen-friendly approach to land management in the Union Territory.
Jammu and Kashmir
Office of LG, J&K
Omar Abdullah
Sunil Sharma
Sat Sharma CA
Deputy CM Surinder choudhary
Ankur Sharma
Altaf Bukhari
Chander Parkash Ganga
Mehbooba Mufti
Sakina Itoo
Dr Farooq Abdullah
Surjit Singh Slathia
Ranbir Singh Pathania
Yudhvir Sethi
#chiefsecretaryjammuandkashmir
#divisionalcommissionerjammu
Advocate at High Court & District Courts of Jammu
#chamberofcommercejammu